Message 98941 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	meador.inge
Recipients	gumtree, mark.dickinson, meador.inge
Date	2010-02-06.15:11:08
SpamBayes Score	7.848275e-06
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1265469071.17.0.565126548901.issue5211@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
> if complex were made 'new-style' in 2.7, then it would be possible to > write fairly obvious code (not using coerce or __coerce__) that operated > in the same way in both 2.7 and 3.2. So I still think it's worth > considering. Agreed. I have attached a patch with src, test, and doc changes.

> if complex were made 'new-style' in 2.7, then it *would* be possible to > write fairly obvious code (not using coerce or __coerce__) that operated > in the same way in both 2.7 and 3.2.  So I still think it's worth 
> considering.

Agreed.  I have attached a patch with src, test, and doc changes.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-02-06 15:11:11	meador.inge	set	recipients: + meador.inge, mark.dickinson, gumtree
2010-02-06 15:11:11	meador.inge	set	messageid: <1265469071.17.0.565126548901.issue5211@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-02-06 15:11:09	meador.inge	link	issue5211 messages
2010-02-06 15:11:08	meador.inge	create