Message98784
Yes, I'd certainly be interested in reviewing a patch. Though the current behaviour is at most a minor wart, and since it's gone in Python 3.x the motivation to fix it isn't huge. :)
> Where as I think gumtree wants the xcomplex case to behave as
> the xfloat case, e.g. ...
Yes, that was what I was proposing. But as you point out, the new behaviour wouldn't even match the behaviour of Python 3.x, so it really wouldn't be a terribly useful change.
> However, if we are going to do that then we might as well just
> backport the whole removal of coercion.
That's not really an option: it has the potential to break existing code that uses coercion. Removing coercion in Python 2.x would require at least a PEP plus one version's worth of DeprecationWarning. And given that it currently looks as though Python 2.8 isn't likely to happen at all, that would likely be a wasted effort. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-02-03 14:12:10 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients:
+ mark.dickinson, gumtree, meador.inge |
2010-02-03 14:12:10 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1265206330.11.0.404826379137.issue5211@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-02-03 14:12:08 | mark.dickinson | link | issue5211 messages |
2010-02-03 14:12:07 | mark.dickinson | create | |
|