This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author rcohen
Recipients brian.curtin, jnoller, kevinwatters, lemburg, nascheme, pitrou, rcohen, schmir
Date 2010-01-29.22:33:30
SpamBayes Score 1.2519386e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <20100129143020.67f0ff65@neeble>
In-reply-to <4B634FDD.50700@egenix.com>
Content
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:15:14 +0000
Marc-Andre Lemburg <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

> Breaking existing applications and ports of Python for 2.7
> certainly won't make anything easier for anyone.
> 
> For 2.7 we will certainly not allow the above to happen,
> since that's the version that's going to be used by most
> people for a few years to come.
> 
> What we could do for 2.7, is add Py3k deprecation warnings
> to the alternative thread implementations, mentioning their
> removal in 3.2.

What if, as you proposed earlier, the patch were to leave the old
behavior if the threading model on the given platform were not
supported?

Ross
History
Date User Action Args
2010-01-29 22:33:32rcohensetrecipients: + rcohen, lemburg, nascheme, pitrou, schmir, kevinwatters, jnoller, brian.curtin
2010-01-29 22:33:30rcohenlinkissue7753 messages
2010-01-29 22:33:30rcohencreate