Fair enough. Thanks.

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Bob Ippolito <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

>
> Bob Ippolito <bob@redivi.com> added the comment:
>
> The json module departs slightly from the spec in that it will allow you
> to consume and produce documents that don't have an array or object
> envelope. This is a feature.
>
> The "Too deep" test case is just a silly thing that crockford's code
> does, there's a fixed limitation for how complex an object could be.
> That's not a regression failure and the spec doesn't say anything about
> a maximum nesting level.
>
> The json module includes all of these in its test suite, although it
> disagrees slightly with crockford on what should pass.
>
> http://svn.python.org/view/python/branches/release26-
> maint/Lib/json/tests/test_fail.py<http://svn.python.org/view/python/branches/release26-%0Amaint/Lib/json/tests/test_fail.py>
>
> SKIPS = {
>    1: "why not have a string payload?",
>    18: "spec doesn't specify any nesting limitations",
> }
>
> ----------
> resolution:  -> invalid
> status: open -> closed
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue7274>
> _______________________________________
>