This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ubershmekel
Recipients cvrebert, mark.dickinson, ubershmekel
Date 2009-08-27.07:03:19
SpamBayes Score 8.5542684e-14
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1251356603.21.0.925481894937.issue6783@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Use case - 'hashing' a counter for example like video ID's in youtube. 
One could use a regular int internally and publish a shorter 62-base id 
for links.

Guido said on http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-
January/059923.html
"I think we ought to let this sit for a while and come back to it in a
few week's time. Is 'base' really the right name? It could just as
well be considered a conversion in the other direction. In common
usage, 'base' and 'radix' are about synonymous (except no-one uses
radix). Pethaps the 2nd argument should not be a keyword argument?

Also, this discussion made me wonder if conversions using other bases
than 10 should even be built-ins. A library module seems a more
appropriate place"

I'm hoping 182 weeks of clarity could help iron this issue out.
History
Date User Action Args
2009-08-27 07:03:23ubershmekelsetrecipients: + ubershmekel, mark.dickinson, cvrebert
2009-08-27 07:03:23ubershmekelsetmessageid: <1251356603.21.0.925481894937.issue6783@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009-08-27 07:03:21ubershmekellinkissue6783 messages
2009-08-27 07:03:19ubershmekelcreate