Message86680
> I don't see any problem with dealing with width, alignment
> and padding with a user-specified fill character; I think we
> should keep these if possible. It's just zero padding where
> it's not clear what should happen.
You're correct. It's just zero padding that would be disabled.
> For the bits that are disabled (e.g., zero padding), should
> there be a ValueError raised, or do those bits just get
> silently ignored?
I think a ValueError would be best. That way if we decide to give it some
meaning in the future, we know it won't change any working code. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-04-27 16:58:31 | eric.smith | set | recipients:
+ eric.smith, gvanrossum, mark.dickinson, ajaksu2, mark |
2009-04-27 16:58:29 | eric.smith | link | issue1588 messages |
2009-04-27 16:58:29 | eric.smith | create | |
|