Message86679
> How about this:
> - we have a single specifier with the same format as floats
> - we force the sign on the imaginary part to be '+', no
> matter what was specified
> - we add a 'j' after the imaginary part
This sounds good to me. I assume a '+' would still affect
the sign of the real part?
> - we ignore any width specified (and therefor any alignment
> and padding)
I don't see any problem with dealing with width, alignment
and padding with a user-specified fill character; I think we
should keep these if possible. It's just zero padding where
it's not clear what should happen.
For the bits that are disabled (e.g., zero padding), should
there be a ValueError raised, or do those bits just get
silently ignored? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-04-27 16:51:53 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients:
+ mark.dickinson, gvanrossum, eric.smith, ajaksu2, mark |
2009-04-27 16:51:52 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1240851112.76.0.198463429929.issue1588@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2009-04-27 16:51:51 | mark.dickinson | link | issue1588 messages |
2009-04-27 16:51:51 | mark.dickinson | create | |
|