This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author giampaolo.rodola
Recipients akuchling, alexer, calvin, giampaolo.rodola, janssen, josiahcarlson, klimkin, loewis
Date 2009-03-31.21:28:36
SpamBayes Score 3.0867654e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1238534917.83.0.53987890826.issue909005@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> I can't think of a situation where handle_close() is called, but close()
> should not be called. If indeed so, i feel it's weird to require the
> user remember to call close(), and it should IMHO be done automatically.

It's already done automatically if you don't override handle_close.
History
Date User Action Args
2009-03-31 21:28:37giampaolo.rodolasetrecipients: + giampaolo.rodola, loewis, akuchling, calvin, josiahcarlson, klimkin, janssen, alexer
2009-03-31 21:28:37giampaolo.rodolasetmessageid: <1238534917.83.0.53987890826.issue909005@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2009-03-31 21:28:36giampaolo.rodolalinkissue909005 messages
2009-03-31 21:28:36giampaolo.rodolacreate