Message84638
I agree with Raymond.
In general, the collections module should define containers that are
named after their function rather than their implementation. That way
the implementation can be changed at a later date (or in other Python
implementations) without causing confusion, and it makes it more obvious
what use-case the new collection is solving. That's my opinion, anyway.
As much as I'd love to see more container types in the collections
module (my kingdom for a heap with .decrease_key()!), I don't see what
use-case this implementation of red-black trees fills. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2009-03-30 20:25:15 | stutzbach | set | recipients:
+ stutzbach, loewis, rhettinger, hyeshik.chang |
2009-03-30 20:25:15 | stutzbach | set | messageid: <1238444715.49.0.180609134425.issue1324770@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2009-03-30 20:25:14 | stutzbach | link | issue1324770 messages |
2009-03-30 20:25:13 | stutzbach | create | |
|