Message77693
Not sure the "del e" idea was a good solution to the garbage collection
problem. Amaury's code looks correct to me. Maybe the existing e
variable should be overwritten and the left intact (as it used to be) or
perhaps it should be made both temporary and invisible like the
induction variable in a list comprehension.
Phillip, any thoughts? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2008-12-12 23:29:13 | rhettinger | set | recipients:
+ rhettinger, jhylton, terry.reedy, pje, amaury.forgeotdarc |
2008-12-12 23:29:13 | rhettinger | set | messageid: <1229124553.23.0.6988651496.issue4617@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2008-12-12 23:29:12 | rhettinger | link | issue4617 messages |
2008-12-12 23:29:12 | rhettinger | create | |
|