Message 72041 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	amaury.forgeotdarc
Recipients	amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, pitrou, vstinner
Date	2008-08-27.20:52:36
SpamBayes Score	0.00010496624
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1219870358.23.0.989115062351.issue3611@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Some progress: The lines suppressed by the patch at http://bugs.python.org/msg71579 either do nothing (because e.g exc_type is already NULL or None), or happen to be in a case similar to the script "lostcontext2.py" (Most of the time, the flush() function in io.py). So again, I think these lines should be suppressed. The test suite still pass, and all the "-R::" I ran did return identical result. Can this patch go in?

Some progress:
The lines suppressed by the patch at http://bugs.python.org/msg71579
either do nothing (because e.g exc_type is already NULL or None),
or happen to be in a case similar to the script "lostcontext2.py"
(Most of the time, the flush() function in io.py).

So again, I think these lines should be suppressed.
The test suite still pass, and all the "-R::" I ran did return identical
result.
Can this patch go in?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-08-27 20:52:38	amaury.forgeotdarc	set	recipients: + amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, vstinner, benjamin.peterson
2008-08-27 20:52:38	amaury.forgeotdarc	set	messageid: <1219870358.23.0.989115062351.issue3611@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-08-27 20:52:37	amaury.forgeotdarc	link	issue3611 messages
2008-08-27 20:52:36	amaury.forgeotdarc	create