Message 69550 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	amaury.forgeotdarc
Recipients	Rhamphoryncus, amaury.forgeotdarc, jnoller, mikemccand, pitrou, tzot
Date	2008-07-11.13:08:04
SpamBayes Score	0.0009404023
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1215781686.7.0.00987115616237.issue874900@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
I agree. My attempt to describe the behaviour of fork+threads in a platform-independent test is another issue. Just one more thing: looking at Module/posixmodule.c, os.fork1() calls PyOS_AfterFork() in both parent and child processes. Is there a "if (pid == 0)" test missing, just like os.fork()?

I agree. My attempt to describe the behaviour of fork+threads in a
platform-independent test is another issue.

Just one more thing: looking at Module/posixmodule.c, os.fork1() calls
PyOS_AfterFork() in both parent and child processes. Is there a "if (pid
== 0)" test missing, just like os.fork()?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-07-11 13:08:07	amaury.forgeotdarc	set	spambayes_score: 0.000940402 -> 0.0009404023 recipients: + amaury.forgeotdarc, mikemccand, tzot, Rhamphoryncus, pitrou, jnoller
2008-07-11 13:08:06	amaury.forgeotdarc	set	spambayes_score: 0.000940402 -> 0.000940402 messageid: <1215781686.7.0.00987115616237.issue874900@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-07-11 13:08:05	amaury.forgeotdarc	link	issue874900 messages
2008-07-11 13:08:05	amaury.forgeotdarc	create