Message 67296 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	barry, benjamin.peterson, collinwinter, jyasskin, pitrou
Date	2008-05-24.12:53:12
SpamBayes Score	0.11453287
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1211633593.83.0.497656542853.issue2507@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
I don't think so. As Amaury pointed in #2833, the original re-raising behaviour which got changed by fixing the present bug was rather broken in its own way. Anyway, I think the question better be asked on the ML because any solution for the re-raising behaviour will require some significant trickery in the compiler and the eval loop.

I don't think so. As Amaury pointed in #2833, the original re-raising
behaviour which got changed by fixing the present bug was rather broken
in its own way.
Anyway, I think the question better be asked on the ML because any
solution for the re-raising behaviour will require some significant
trickery in the compiler and the eval loop.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-05-24 12:53:14	pitrou	set	spambayes_score: 0.114533 -> 0.11453287 recipients: + pitrou, barry, collinwinter, jyasskin, benjamin.peterson
2008-05-24 12:53:13	pitrou	set	spambayes_score: 0.114533 -> 0.114533 messageid: <1211633593.83.0.497656542853.issue2507@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-05-24 12:53:13	pitrou	link	issue2507 messages
2008-05-24 12:53:12	pitrou	create