Message65798
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Mark Dickinson <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
..
> I don't much like this aspect of the change: there are uses for
>
> for i in range(ridiculously_large_number):
For this application, I would use "for i in itertools.count():"
instead. The only caveat is that while count() lets you specify the
start, it does not provide for a step. If that is a problem, I would
rather add step to count(). |
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2008-04-25 17:32:08 | belopolsky | set | spambayes_score: 0.280672 -> 0.280672 recipients:
+ belopolsky, marketdickinson |
| 2008-04-25 17:32:07 | belopolsky | link | issue2690 messages |
| 2008-04-25 17:32:06 | belopolsky | create | |
|