Author marketdickinson
Recipients belopolsky, marketdickinson
Date 2008-04-25.16:55:19
SpamBayes Score 0.285889
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1209142520.32.0.6963312679.issue2690@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
So with this patch, range(10**100) produces an OverflowError:  is that 
right?

I don't much like this aspect of the change:   there are uses for

for i in range(ridiculously_large_number):
   ...
   if condition_that_occurs_early_in_practice:
       break
History
Date User Action Args
2008-04-25 16:55:20marketdickinsonsetspambayes_score: 0.285889 -> 0.285889
recipients: + marketdickinson, belopolsky
2008-04-25 16:55:20marketdickinsonsetspambayes_score: 0.285889 -> 0.285889
messageid: <1209142520.32.0.6963312679.issue2690@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-04-25 16:55:19marketdickinsonlinkissue2690 messages
2008-04-25 16:55:19marketdickinsoncreate