This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author twouters
Recipients belopolsky, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, twouters
Date 2008-04-07.20:02:08
SpamBayes Score 0.081526235
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1207598530.32.0.611014449761.issue2292@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I'm not sure how this matters. The order of evaluation is the same, the
BUILD_SET implementation just hashes the evaluated items in a different
order. You can't really rely on that particular order as it's tied
closely to the stack representation CPython uses. I also see no
practical reason -- or even practical *way* -- to abuse the hashing
order. But you have given me an idea on how to improve some of the code
in the BUILD_*_UNPACK opcodes, hmm.
History
Date User Action Args
2008-04-07 20:02:10twouterssetspambayes_score: 0.0815262 -> 0.081526235
recipients: + twouters, gvanrossum, georg.brandl, belopolsky
2008-04-07 20:02:10twouterssetspambayes_score: 0.0815262 -> 0.0815262
messageid: <1207598530.32.0.611014449761.issue2292@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-04-07 20:02:09twouterslinkissue2292 messages
2008-04-07 20:02:08twouterscreate