Message 65004 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	gpolo
Recipients	georg.brandl, gpolo, loewis, schmir
Date	2008-04-05.19:55:04
SpamBayes Score	0.092575975
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1207425305.51.0.956014466641.issue2240@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
FreeBSD's man page for setitimer/getitimer doesn't look different from the one in Linux. But.. both tests assumes the computer is not so fast that it finishes "for i in xrange(100000000)" before the timer expire, maybe it was not the case in that machine. Both timers (virtual and prof) are set to expire after 0.2 seconds, and for itimer_virtual it restarts the timer 3 times before setting it to 0. If someone has a freebsd machine (a fast one apparently) that could run some tests and help me on this, it would be very nice. Also sorry for various typos in my last message.

FreeBSD's man page for setitimer/getitimer doesn't look different from
the one in Linux. 
But.. both tests assumes the computer is not so fast that it finishes
"for i in xrange(100000000)" before the timer expire, maybe it was not
the case in that machine. Both timers (virtual and prof) are set to
expire after 0.2 seconds, and for itimer_virtual it restarts the timer 3
times before setting it to 0.
If someone has a freebsd machine (a fast one apparently) that could run
some tests and help me on this, it would be very nice.

Also sorry for various typos in my last message.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-04-05 19:55:05	gpolo	set	spambayes_score: 0.092576 -> 0.092575975 recipients: + gpolo, loewis, georg.brandl, schmir
2008-04-05 19:55:05	gpolo	set	spambayes_score: 0.092576 -> 0.092576 messageid: <1207425305.51.0.956014466641.issue2240@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-04-05 19:55:04	gpolo	link	issue2240 messages
2008-04-05 19:55:04	gpolo	create