Message 58810 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	facundobatista
Recipients	facundobatista, gvanrossum, jyasskin, mark.dickinson
Date	2007-12-19.17:06:07
SpamBayes Score	0.13848293
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1198083967.69.0.604610924488.issue1623@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
I'm +1 to this change. As this does not negatively affect the behavior on Py2, for each part of the patch I propose: - decimal.py: incorporate them to the trunk - numbers.py: of course, in Py3 - test_decimal.py: incorporate this tests, activating them if in Py3 What do you think?

I'm +1 to this change.

As this does not negatively affect the behavior on Py2, for each part of
the patch I propose:

- decimal.py: incorporate them to the trunk
- numbers.py: of course, in Py3
- test_decimal.py: incorporate this tests, activating them if in Py3

What do you think?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2007-12-19 17:06:08	facundobatista	set	spambayes_score: 0.138483 -> 0.13848293 recipients: + facundobatista, gvanrossum, mark.dickinson, jyasskin
2007-12-19 17:06:07	facundobatista	set	spambayes_score: 0.138483 -> 0.138483 messageid: <1198083967.69.0.604610924488.issue1623@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2007-12-19 17:06:07	facundobatista	link	issue1623 messages
2007-12-19 17:06:07	facundobatista	create