Author schmir
Recipients astrand, mattjohnston, mpitt, schmir, timjr
Date 2007-11-02.16:30:18
SpamBayes Score 0.235624
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1194021018.99.0.869095776166.issue1068268@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
In normal application code that signal.alarm is called for a reason. And
the caller most probably expects it to interrupt the read calls. So I
think the proposed patch is wrong. 

What was the signal interrupting the read calls? maybe SIGPIPE?
History
Date User Action Args
2007-11-02 16:30:19schmirsetspambayes_score: 0.235624 -> 0.235624
recipients: + schmir, astrand, mattjohnston, mpitt, timjr
2007-11-02 16:30:19schmirsetspambayes_score: 0.235624 -> 0.235624
messageid: <1194021018.99.0.869095776166.issue1068268@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2007-11-02 16:30:18schmirlinkissue1068268 messages
2007-11-02 16:30:18schmircreate