Message 55343 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	gagern
Recipients	barry, collinwinter, gagern, georg.brandl
Date	2007-08-28.00:32:36
SpamBayes Score	0.18554758
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1188261157.31.0.633528338059.issue1670765@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Looks like I missed your comments on this patch. What kind of tests do you have in mind? Tests demonstrating where current implementation fails and my patch will help? Or rather tests checking that this patch won't break anything else? The former would be easy enough, but for the latter I'm not sure how far this would go, as people tend to make strange assumptions I would never have thought of.

Looks like I missed your comments on this patch.
What kind of tests do you have in mind?
Tests demonstrating where current implementation fails and my patch will
help? Or rather tests checking that this patch won't break anything
else? The former would be easy enough, but for the latter I'm not sure
how far this would go, as people tend to make strange assumptions I
would never have thought of.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2007-08-28 00:32:37	gagern	set	spambayes_score: 0.185548 -> 0.18554758 recipients: + gagern, barry, georg.brandl, collinwinter
2007-08-28 00:32:37	gagern	set	spambayes_score: 0.185548 -> 0.185548 messageid: <1188261157.31.0.633528338059.issue1670765@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2007-08-28 00:32:37	gagern	link	issue1670765 messages
2007-08-28 00:32:36	gagern	create