This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author christian.heimes
Recipients
Date 2007-03-28.14:48:39
SpamBayes Score
Marked as misclassified
Message-id
In-reply-to
Content
Yes, you are right. There is no place where the ptch checks for truncating - because the patch doesn't change the size of time_t. The current patch defines Py_time_t is an alias for time_t so 3rd party authors can update their software to use Py_time_t instead of time_t in Python 2.6.

Also it gives me time to study the impacts on systems with a 32bit time_t and to get feedback from core developers. May we take the discussion to python-ideas? I've started a thread yesterday.
History
Date User Action Args
2007-08-23 15:57:46adminlinkissue1689402 messages
2007-08-23 15:57:46admincreate