Logged In: YES 
user_id=1038590

I beefed up the tests to pick up the error Ralf spotted in
the previous version of the patch, and added more comments
to getmodule() to explain why some things are the way they
are (specifically the use of sys.modules.items() and the use
of module.__name__).

Committed to the trunk - I'll backport tomorrow night unless
Neal objects.