Message50469
Logged In: YES
user_id=33168
I'm ok with the idea of this patch for 2.5 if you can get in
before the freeze. If you do check in, be sure to watch the
buildbots. But I have some specific comments/concerns below.
A couple of notes about Scott's patch. I would prefer the
macro name to be HAVE_CURSES_RESIZETERM. I don't understand
why there are 2 variants with and without the _. I see
there are 2 different curses APIs. Does the single HAVE_
cover the cases of having is_term_resized, resize_term, and
resizeterm? It seems like it might be better to have 2 or 3
configure checks. |
|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2007-08-23 15:52:48 | admin | link | issue1506645 messages |
| 2007-08-23 15:52:48 | admin | create | |
|