Author nnorwitz
Recipients
Date 2006-06-18.18:21:54
SpamBayes Score
Marked as misclassified
Message-id
In-reply-to
Content
Logged In: YES 
user_id=33168

I'm ok with the idea of this patch for 2.5 if you can get in
before the freeze.  If you do check in, be sure to watch the
buildbots.  But I have some specific comments/concerns below.

A couple of notes about Scott's patch.  I would prefer the
macro name to be HAVE_CURSES_RESIZETERM.  I don't understand
why there are 2 variants with and without the _.  I see
there are 2 different curses APIs.  Does the single HAVE_
cover the cases of having is_term_resized, resize_term, and
resizeterm?  It seems like it might be better to have 2 or 3
configure checks.
History
Date User Action Args
2007-08-23 15:52:48adminlinkissue1506645 messages
2007-08-23 15:52:48admincreate