Message297873
It seems Guido sets a higher bar on the proposed change.
@pfreixes, if you can show that this change is needed to implement "TCP half-closed" state (i.e. when remote calls shutdown(SHUT_WR) after it's done sending data but continues to recv(), then local is expected to read out the data, and then confirm reception and issue it's own shutdown(SHUT_WR) so that remote gets the acknowledgement), then there would be no question. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-07-07 09:37:19 | Dima.Tisnek | set | recipients:
+ Dima.Tisnek, gvanrossum, yselivanov, pfreixes |
2017-07-07 09:37:19 | Dima.Tisnek | set | messageid: <1499420239.16.0.441556914865.issue30861@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2017-07-07 09:37:19 | Dima.Tisnek | link | issue30861 messages |
2017-07-07 09:37:19 | Dima.Tisnek | create | |
|