➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients Arfrever, DLitz, aliles, amaury.forgeotdarc, asvetlov, christian.heimes, emptysquare, georg.brandl, grahamd, gregory.p.smith, ionelmc, jcea, lemburg, neologix, pitrou, rpcope1, sbt, serhiy.storchaka, socketpair, twouters, vstinner, xupeng, yselivanov
Date 2017-05-28.09:38:19
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <a35958b0-177a-76ab-5525-281c2f834eb4@free.fr>
In-reply-to <1495963379.23.0.0405631179146.issue16500@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
Le 28/05/2017 à 11:22, Serhiy Storchaka a écrit :
> 
> Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
> 
> Can threading._after_fork() be rewritten with using the new API?

It should be possible indeed. Let me see.
History
Date User Action Args
2017-05-28 09:38:19pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, lemburg, twouters, georg.brandl, gregory.p.smith, jcea, amaury.forgeotdarc, vstinner, christian.heimes, grahamd, Arfrever, ionelmc, asvetlov, neologix, socketpair, sbt, aliles, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov, DLitz, emptysquare, xupeng, rpcope1
2017-05-28 09:38:19pitroulinkissue16500 messages
2017-05-28 09:38:19pitroucreate