Author brett.cannon
Recipients brett.cannon, ezio.melotti, rhettinger
Date 2017-03-20.22:33:18
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1490049199.07.0.61664177999.issue29863@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
In issue #29540 there was a suggestion to add a `compact` argument to json.dump() and json.dumps(). That was eventually rejected as adding complexity to an API that's already messy.

But in GH-72 someone created a COMPACT constant to the json module which gets a similar effect as a `compact` argument but without expanding any APIs. Unfortunately I think the constant proposal got lost in discussion of adding the `compact` argument, so I'm opening a new issue to make a final decision as to whether we should accept/reject the COMPACT constant idea.
History
Date User Action Args
2017-03-20 22:33:19brett.cannonsetrecipients: + brett.cannon, rhettinger, ezio.melotti
2017-03-20 22:33:19brett.cannonsetmessageid: <1490049199.07.0.61664177999.issue29863@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-03-20 22:33:18brett.cannonlinkissue29863 messages
2017-03-20 22:33:18brett.cannoncreate