➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author r.david.murray
Recipients Jim Fasarakis-Hilliard, ammar2, r.david.murray
Date 2017-03-16.03:17:31
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1489634251.65.0.307787999697.issue29812@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
The cross check test itself doesn't depend on a regeneration, but it does depend on the information in token.h.  Meanwhile the validity of *that* is checked by regeneration in your test_token tests.  This is exactly what I had in mind :).

So, I haven't done a full review, but the quick glance I took looked good.
History
Date User Action Args
2017-03-16 03:17:31r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, ammar2, Jim Fasarakis-Hilliard
2017-03-16 03:17:31r.david.murraysetmessageid: <1489634251.65.0.307787999697.issue29812@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-03-16 03:17:31r.david.murraylinkissue29812 messages
2017-03-16 03:17:31r.david.murraycreate