Message 289643 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	mbdevpl
Recipients	Mark.Shannon, brett.cannon, christian.heimes, mbdevpl, pitrou
Date	2017-03-15.06:40:23
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1489560024.01.0.490386464363.issue24119@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
For some time now, there's an alternate ast implementation https://github.com/python/typed_ast that carries PEP 484 type comments with the AST as attributes of certain nodes. Their approach is described here: https://github.com/python/typed_ast/blob/master/typed_ast/ast3.py#L5 If type comments become mainstream in Python, could this approach maybe be adopted as official Python AST at some point?

For some time now, there's an alternate ast implementation https://github.com/python/typed_ast that carries PEP 484 type comments with the AST as attributes of certain nodes.

Their approach is described here: https://github.com/python/typed_ast/blob/master/typed_ast/ast3.py#L5

If type comments become mainstream in Python, could this approach maybe be adopted as official Python AST at some point?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2017-03-15 06:40:24	mbdevpl	set	recipients: + mbdevpl, brett.cannon, pitrou, christian.heimes, Mark.Shannon
2017-03-15 06:40:24	mbdevpl	set	messageid: <1489560024.01.0.490386464363.issue24119@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-03-15 06:40:23	mbdevpl	link	issue24119 messages
2017-03-15 06:40:23	mbdevpl	create