Message289601
The names are super misleading. First, they're written in a way that's the opposite of how people think about these things (CLIENT_AUTH -> server socket; SERVER_AUTH -> client socket). Second, they're misleading, you can have TLS which is *mutually* authenticated. Third, CLIENT_AUTH is very frequently used for a server socket where the client isn't authenticated (at the TLS layer) at all!
A simple fix would be to add: Purpose.{CLIENT,SERVER}_SOCKET and alias the old names to those values. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-03-14 16:17:49 | alex | set | recipients:
+ alex |
2017-03-14 16:17:49 | alex | set | messageid: <1489508269.56.0.751351378955.issue29810@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2017-03-14 16:17:49 | alex | link | issue29810 messages |
2017-03-14 16:17:49 | alex | create | |
|