Message289207
I just merged https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/93602e3af70d3b9f98ae2da654b16b3382b68d50 as the fix for issue #29537, so 3.5.4+ should handle legacy bytecode files without any complaints (and redistributors can backport it to 3.5.3 as needed).
For *this* issue, the main requested change to the proposed test case is to simplify it to use Serhiy's suggested approach: just define a single "EXPECTED_MAGIC_NUMBER" in the test suite, and have that be different on different maintenance branches.
For branches in alpha and beta phase, the test case should be skipped with a message like "Bytecode stability is not checked in alpha & beta releases" |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-03-08 06:52:28 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, barry, brett.cannon, doko, mark.dickinson, petr.viktorin, lukasz.langa, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka, Carson Lam, Eric Appelt, ishcherb |
2017-03-08 06:52:27 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1488955947.97.0.792114576013.issue29514@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2017-03-08 06:52:27 | ncoghlan | link | issue29514 messages |
2017-03-08 06:52:27 | ncoghlan | create | |
|