Trying to fix this in https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/9...but...

Currently there are approx *pause for effect* 6,245 warnings!

Out of those, around 6,243 are 'reference target not found' warnings, spanning over 290 files:


/media/ryan/stuff/cpython/Doc/whatsnew/3.7.rst:121: WARNING: c:member reference target not found: doc
/media/ryan/stuff/cpython/Doc/whatsnew/3.7.rst:121: WARNING: c:type reference target not found: PyGetSetDef
/media/ryan/stuff/cpython/Doc/whatsnew/3.7.rst:121: WARNING: c:type reference target not found: wrapperbase
/media/ryan/stuff/cpython/Doc/whatsnew/3.7.rst:157: WARNING: py:mod reference target not found: ntpath
../../Misc/NEWS:348: WARNING: py:data reference target not found: socket.TCP_CONGESTION
../../Misc/NEWS:348: WARNING: py:data reference target not found: socket.TCP_USER_TIMEOUT
../../Misc/NEWS:1005: WARNING: py:data reference target not found: socket.TCP_CONGESTION
../../Misc/NEWS:1005: WARNING: py:data reference target not found: socket.TCP_USER_TIMEOUT
../../Misc/NEWS:2718: WARNING: py:obj reference target not found: idlelib/*.py
../../Misc/NEWS:2718: WARNING: py:obj reference target not found: idle_test/test_*.py
../../Misc/NEWS:2837: WARNING: c:func reference target not found: malloc
../../Misc/NEWS:2883: WARNING: c:func reference target not found: PyObject_Malloc


For some reason, I don't feel like fixing 6,200 warnings is really feasible (or at least for me), so would it be worth it to, in the mean time, disable this specific kind of warning, at least for the CI builds?