This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author vstinner
Recipients christian.heimes, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date 2017-02-06.10:01:13
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1486375273.69.0.0613827812447.issue29461@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
http://blog.man7.org/2012/10/how-much-do-builtinexpect-likely-and.html

Using __builtin_expect() in a very long loop 10^9 iteratos (1,000,000,000) makes the loop 15% faster (2.67 sec => 2.28 sec), *but*  using PGO avoids the need of using __builtin_expect() explicitly and makes the code 27% faster (2.67 sec => 1.95 sec):

"This optimized version runs significantly faster (1.95 versus 2.28 seconds) than our version that used __builtin_expect(). This is because, in addition to the branching in the if statement, the branching in the for loops was also optimized."

The article also confirms that if __builtin_expect() is misused, it makes the code 5% slower (2.67 sec => 2.79 sec).

--

Another story related to micro-optimization in the Linux kernel.

The Linux kernel used explicit prefetch in some tiny loops. After many benchmarks, it was concluded that letting the developer uses prefetch makes the code slower, and so the micro-optimization was removed:

https://lwn.net/Articles/444336/

“So the conclusion is: prefetches are absolutely toxic, even if the NULL ones are excluded.”
History
Date User Action Args
2017-02-06 10:01:13vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, christian.heimes, serhiy.storchaka
2017-02-06 10:01:13vstinnersetmessageid: <1486375273.69.0.0613827812447.issue29461@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-02-06 10:01:13vstinnerlinkissue29461 messages
2017-02-06 10:01:13vstinnercreate