➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author marco.buttu
Recipients docs@python, marco.buttu, martin.panter, paul.moore, steve.dower, terry.reedy, tim.golden, xiang.zhang, zach.ware
Date 2017-02-04.16:51:39
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1486227099.37.0.377048109282.issue29387@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
I think you are right about the TAB model (Parser/tokenizer.c:40 and Lib/tokenize.py:215), that is why the difference between the two cases.

In any case, I am not sure whether expliciting the type of the exeption is the best choice. So, to me +1 to just change "should report" with "reports" in the proposed patch, and +0 to indicate the exeption type.
History
Date User Action Args
2017-02-04 16:51:39marco.buttusetrecipients: + marco.buttu, terry.reedy, paul.moore, tim.golden, docs@python, martin.panter, zach.ware, steve.dower, xiang.zhang
2017-02-04 16:51:39marco.buttusetmessageid: <1486227099.37.0.377048109282.issue29387@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-02-04 16:51:39marco.buttulinkissue29387 messages
2017-02-04 16:51:39marco.buttucreate