Message275484
Oh, yes, I forgot 2.7 was using the older code.
Sure, that flag name sounds fine. I'm not worrying about policy flag name collisions, but perhaps I should be. How about _py_strict_end_of_headers? I don't really care what it is named for the bug fix, I'll think about the exposed name for 3.7. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-09-09 22:58:31 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, barry, orsenthil, martin.panter, piotr.dobrogost, icordasc, demian.brecht, Lukasa, mgdelmonte |
2016-09-09 22:58:31 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1473461911.28.0.0918353983122.issue24363@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-09-09 22:58:31 | r.david.murray | link | issue24363 messages |
2016-09-09 22:58:31 | r.david.murray | create | |
|