This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author gvanrossum
Recipients Jeff.Kaufman, Joshua.Landau, NeilGirdhar, SpaghettiToastBook, andybuckley, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, berker.peksag, eric.snow, ethan.furman, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, paul.moore, pconnell, r.david.murray, steve.dower, terry.reedy, twouters, zbysz
Date 2015-05-05.23:48:30
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAP7+vJJCAUj21s4ggdRvMn_jROrMKfXxAUEgdrxsaqtP-jNNGA@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <CAP7+vJ+GD2CH+2mxzrmOGP2Fx5F1Rd0LjbRedp3yYcamBXuA3w@mail.gmail.com>
Content
(To clarify, the PEP itself probably serves as enough documentation in the
interim.)

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> wrote:

> Yeah, but the docs don't need to be committed in time for beta 1. The
> source code should go in ASAP, especially since the PEP 492 changes will
> have to be merged in on top of them. @Thomas: which Monday were you
> shooting for? I had hoped yesterday...
>
> On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Benjamin Peterson <report@bugs.python.org>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
>>
>> It certainly would be nice to have documentation.
>>
>> ----------
>>
>> _______________________________________
>> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
>> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2292>
>> _______________________________________
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
>
History
Date User Action Args
2015-05-05 23:48:30gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, twouters, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, paul.moore, ncoghlan, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, andybuckley, r.david.murray, zbysz, ethan.furman, eric.snow, berker.peksag, Joshua.Landau, steve.dower, pconnell, NeilGirdhar, Jeff.Kaufman, SpaghettiToastBook
2015-05-05 23:48:30gvanrossumlinkissue2292 messages
2015-05-05 23:48:30gvanrossumcreate