Message242625
(To clarify, the PEP itself probably serves as enough documentation in the
interim.)
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> wrote:
> Yeah, but the docs don't need to be committed in time for beta 1. The
> source code should go in ASAP, especially since the PEP 492 changes will
> have to be merged in on top of them. @Thomas: which Monday were you
> shooting for? I had hoped yesterday...
>
> On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Benjamin Peterson <report@bugs.python.org>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
>>
>> It certainly would be nice to have documentation.
>>
>> ----------
>>
>> _______________________________________
>> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
>> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2292>
>> _______________________________________
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
> |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-05-05 23:48:30 | gvanrossum | set | recipients:
+ gvanrossum, twouters, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, paul.moore, ncoghlan, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, andybuckley, r.david.murray, zbysz, ethan.furman, eric.snow, berker.peksag, Joshua.Landau, steve.dower, pconnell, NeilGirdhar, Jeff.Kaufman, SpaghettiToastBook |
2015-05-05 23:48:30 | gvanrossum | link | issue2292 messages |
2015-05-05 23:48:30 | gvanrossum | create | |
|