Message234681
Amazing, thanks.
I also just uncovered http://bugs.python.org/issue23316; we'll need to support a patch for that. In fact, bad evaluation order is why I haven't yet gotten down my unification strategy. I wouldn't worry about extra opcodes when using *args or **kwargs, though; what matters is mostly avoiding extra copies. I guess a few `timeit`s will show whether I'm right or totally off-base.
Most of what's needed for the error stuff is already implemented; one just needs to set the top bit flag (currently just 1<<8) to "1 + arg_count_on_stack()", which is a trivial change. I'll push a patch for that after I'm done fiddling with the unification idea. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-01-25 18:42:29 | Joshua.Landau | set | recipients:
+ Joshua.Landau, gvanrossum, twouters, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, paul.moore, ncoghlan, belopolsky, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, andybuckley, r.david.murray, zbysz, eric.snow, berker.peksag, pconnell, NeilGirdhar, Jeff.Kaufman, SpaghettiToastBook |
2015-01-25 18:42:29 | Joshua.Landau | set | messageid: <1422211349.48.0.278617687641.issue2292@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-01-25 18:42:29 | Joshua.Landau | link | issue2292 messages |
2015-01-25 18:42:29 | Joshua.Landau | create | |
|