➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author gvanrossum
Recipients Andrew.Boettcher, ajaksu2, akira, astrand, cvrebert, ericpruitt, eryksun, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, janzert, josiahcarlson, martin.panter, ooooooooo, parameter, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, sbt, techtonik, v+python, vstinner, yselivanov
Date 2014-05-30.00:07:47
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1401408467.98.0.43625307893.issue1191964@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
FWIW while the Tulip changes should indeed go into the Tulip repo first, the rest should be committed to the CPython 3.5 tree first. Then I'll commit the Tulip changes, first to the Tulip repo, then to the CPython 3.4 branch (yes!) and then merge that into the 3.5 (default) branch. (Yes, I know it's complicated, but it beats other ways of keeping the Tulip and CPython trees in sync. And I have a script in the Tulip tree that automates most of the work.)
History
Date User Action Args
2014-05-30 00:07:48gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, josiahcarlson, astrand, parameter, vstinner, techtonik, giampaolo.rodola, ajaksu2, ooooooooo, v+python, r.david.murray, cvrebert, ericpruitt, akira, Andrew.Boettcher, rosslagerwall, sbt, martin.panter, janzert, yselivanov, eryksun
2014-05-30 00:07:47gvanrossumsetmessageid: <1401408467.98.0.43625307893.issue1191964@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-05-30 00:07:47gvanrossumlinkissue1191964 messages
2014-05-30 00:07:47gvanrossumcreate