Message216560
I like that approach decidedly more than my original one. Suggested revision patch attached.
The sample script will not produce the following:
error: uncaptured python exception, closing channel <__main__.fake_asynchat 127.0.0.1:8000 at 0x7f10a85b4ae8> (<class 'TypeError'>:data must be a bytes object [/home/caelyn/CPython/async_chat_error/Lib/asyncore.py|write|91] [/home/caelyn/CPython/async_chat_error/Lib/asyncore.py|handle_write_event|460] [/home/caelyn/CPython/async_chat_error/Lib/asyncore.py|handle_connect_event|448] [asynchat_example.py|handle_connect|16] [/home/caelyn/CPython/async_chat_error/Lib/asynchat.py|push|185])
Which is, I think, is a bit more useful. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-04-16 19:18:53 | math_foo | set | recipients:
+ math_foo, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, Gryllida, jcao219 |
2014-04-16 19:18:53 | math_foo | set | messageid: <1397675933.08.0.795639977026.issue12523@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-04-16 19:18:53 | math_foo | link | issue12523 messages |
2014-04-16 19:18:52 | math_foo | create | |
|