➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author mark.dickinson
Recipients Arfrever, BreamoreBoy, benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl, larry, loewis, mark.dickinson, mirabilos, pitrou, schwab, skrah, tim.peters
Date 2014-04-09.17:23:25
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1397064206.32.0.949352031405.issue20904@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
> under some conditions involving denormalized numbers the result may lose a bit of precision

That sounds like a non-issue for this application: the dtoa.c computations are careful to avoid subnormals in intermediate computations.

If mirabilos has withdrawn his objection, is there anything blocking applying this for 3.5?
History
Date User Action Args
2014-04-09 17:23:26mark.dickinsonsetrecipients: + mark.dickinson, tim.peters, loewis, georg.brandl, pitrou, larry, benjamin.peterson, Arfrever, skrah, BreamoreBoy, mirabilos, schwab
2014-04-09 17:23:26mark.dickinsonsetmessageid: <1397064206.32.0.949352031405.issue20904@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-04-09 17:23:26mark.dickinsonlinkissue20904 messages
2014-04-09 17:23:25mark.dickinsoncreate