➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author belopolsky
Recipients Juarez.Bochi, Julian.Gindi, adam-collard, ajaksu2, alanvgreen, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, berker.peksag, cvrebert, guettli, jafo, josh-sf, maciej.szulik, mark.dickinson, petre, sonderblade, tiktuk, vajrasky, westley.martinez
Date 2014-04-03.21:53:41
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1396562021.84.0.0994382666219.issue1100942@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
Is this documentation still valid?

+.. staticmethod:: date.strptime(date_string, format)
+
+   Return a :class:`date` corresponding to *date_string*, parsed according to
+   *format*.  This is equivalent to ``date(*(time.strptime(date_string,
+   format)[0:3]))``.

I understand that the latest patch includes checking for time fields in date format.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-04-03 21:53:41belopolskysetrecipients: + belopolsky, jafo, guettli, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, sonderblade, alanvgreen, ajaksu2, josh-sf, cvrebert, tiktuk, adam-collard, westley.martinez, berker.peksag, maciej.szulik, Juarez.Bochi, petre, vajrasky, Julian.Gindi
2014-04-03 21:53:41belopolskysetmessageid: <1396562021.84.0.0994382666219.issue1100942@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-04-03 21:53:41belopolskylinkissue1100942 messages
2014-04-03 21:53:41belopolskycreate