Message 211769 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	yselivanov
Recipients	larry, ncoghlan, yselivanov
Date	2014-02-21.00:23:29
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1392942209.55.0.970182044944.issue20710@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Larry, I think you can use undocumented and private (but still heavily tested) 'inspect._signature_internal(skip_bound_arg=False)', instead of signature. That will give you a Signature object with 'self' parameter always included. And in 3.5 we'll probably make this option (renamed, hopefully), public, and switch pydoc to use new API again. What do you think?

Larry, I think you can use undocumented and private (but still heavily tested) 'inspect._signature_internal(skip_bound_arg=False)', instead of signature.  That will give you a Signature object with 'self' parameter always included.

And in 3.5 we'll probably make this option (renamed, hopefully), public, and switch pydoc to use new API again.

What do you think?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2014-02-21 00:23:29	yselivanov	set	recipients: + yselivanov, ncoghlan, larry
2014-02-21 00:23:29	yselivanov	set	messageid: <1392942209.55.0.970182044944.issue20710@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-02-21 00:23:29	yselivanov	link	issue20710 messages
2014-02-21 00:23:29	yselivanov	create