Message 206254 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	pitrou, schwab, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, vstinner
Date	2013-12-15.20:21:14
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1387138871.2296.0.camel@fsol>
In-reply-to	<1387138803.33.0.0513019442856.issue19537@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
> How about adding explicit padding to the bitfield in PyASCIIObject? That sounds ok to me, but it must be explicitly for 68k (or use a sufficiently smart scheme not to affect already aligned architectures).

> How about adding explicit padding to the bitfield in PyASCIIObject?

That sounds ok to me, but it must be explicitly for 68k (or use a
sufficiently smart scheme not to affect already aligned architectures).

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2013-12-15 20:21:14	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, vstinner, skrah, serhiy.storchaka, schwab
2013-12-15 20:21:14	pitrou	link	issue19537 messages
2013-12-15 20:21:14	pitrou	create