Message20610
Logged In: YES
user_id=80475
Applied a small, slightly cheaper (no second multiply)
variation on Tim's original. It is not as scientfic
looking, but is does assure changing, odd multipliers for
each position. When Tim moved the XOR before the multiply,
that fixed the OP's original problem.
The new variation survives Tim's torture test which I
augmented a bit and put in the test suite for the benefit of
future generations.
See:
Objects\tupleobject.c 2.91
Lib\test\test_tuple.py 1.3
|
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2007-08-23 14:21:14 | admin | link | issue942952 messages |
2007-08-23 14:21:14 | admin | create | |
|