This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author barry
Recipients Arfrever, akuchling, barry, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, georg.brandl, giampaolo.rodola, larry, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka
Date 2013-09-15.16:54:20
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <20130915125405.29ba135e@anarchist>
In-reply-to <1379263653.25.0.722698801999.issue16042@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
On Sep 15, 2013, at 04:47 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:

>It is not important in the context of this issue, but readline(0) is blocked
>and returns 1-character string. Move the length check above
>self.sslobj.read(1). For readability you can also move the chr != "\n" inside
>the loop:
>
>             while size is None or len(str) < size:
>                 chr = self.sslobj.read(1)
>                 if not chr or chr == "\n": break
>                 str += chr

Hi Serhiy.  Is there a functional difference to re-arranging this loop?
All things being equal, the minimal change is probably best.

Also, what do you mean by "readline(0) is blocked"?  Do you mean this is a
blocking call or something else?
History
Date User Action Args
2013-09-15 16:54:20barrysetrecipients: + barry, akuchling, georg.brandl, larry, giampaolo.rodola, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, Arfrever, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka
2013-09-15 16:54:20barrylinkissue16042 messages
2013-09-15 16:54:20barrycreate