This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author orsenthil
Recipients AndrewTrick, benjamin.peterson, cameron, chrisl, ckassab, cmcqueen1975, djc, doko, dpeterson, facundobatista, gregory.p.smith, hozn, jamesbroadhead, jarek.jpa, jcea, jjlee, kxroberto, l, matb, matejcik, mihalis68, mjpieters, mwilck, nfl, orsenthil, piranha, poeml, r.david.murray, statik, vila
Date 2013-09-13.06:32:32
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1379053952.56.0.575700114858.issue1424152@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I have a slight fear that this patch could be considered as a feature addition in 2.7 urllib.py, I would like to quell that and ensure that behaviour expectation is consistent when using urllib or urllib2 and latest urllib/request.py modules.

Also, tests + docs can help a lot in speedier reviews.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-09-13 06:32:32orsenthilsetrecipients: + orsenthil, doko, facundobatista, gregory.p.smith, jjlee, mjpieters, jcea, kxroberto, vila, matejcik, benjamin.peterson, djc, mwilck, chrisl, mihalis68, dpeterson, poeml, cameron, matb, nfl, AndrewTrick, ckassab, r.david.murray, hozn, statik, piranha, jamesbroadhead, cmcqueen1975, jarek.jpa, l
2013-09-13 06:32:32orsenthilsetmessageid: <1379053952.56.0.575700114858.issue1424152@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-09-13 06:32:32orsenthillinkissue1424152 messages
2013-09-13 06:32:32orsenthilcreate