➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients V.E.O, amaury.forgeotdarc, brian.curtin, christian.heimes, m_python, mloskot, pitrou, tim.golden, tim.peters, vstinner
Date 2013-09-11.11:34:50
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1684239331.53513321.1378899284041.JavaMail.root@zimbra10-e2.priv.proxad.net>
In-reply-to <1378893869.88.0.72287607227.issue17797@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
> I'm not sure which minor version of Python 3.2 it was, but in my
> comment in msg187362, I confirmed that I have tested the later
> version with added is_valid_fd function. As far as I understand, the
> changes in http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/f15943505db0/ introduce
> that is_valid_fd function, which does not seem to solve the problem.

Could you try to investigate this a bit further? Does is_valid_fd()
return true, and why?
History
Date User Action Args
2013-09-11 11:34:50pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, tim.peters, amaury.forgeotdarc, vstinner, christian.heimes, tim.golden, brian.curtin, mloskot, V.E.O, m_python
2013-09-11 11:34:50pitroulinkissue17797 messages
2013-09-11 11:34:50pitroucreate