This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ncoghlan
Recipients christian.heimes, jcea, leim, macfreek, ncoghlan, pmoody, santoso.wijaya, terry.reedy
Date 2013-08-24.15:03:15
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1377356595.85.0.880570551558.issue17400@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Reopening this - rewording the issue title to cover the problem to be solved (i.e. accounting for RFC 6598 addresses) rather than a specific solution (which isn't appropriate, since the RFC *explicitly* states that shared addresses and private addresses aren't the same thing)

It seems to me that the simplest solution would be to use the terminology from RFC 6598 and add a new "is_shared" attribute to addresses.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-08-24 15:03:15ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, terry.reedy, jcea, macfreek, christian.heimes, pmoody, santoso.wijaya, leim
2013-08-24 15:03:15ncoghlansetmessageid: <1377356595.85.0.880570551558.issue17400@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-08-24 15:03:15ncoghlanlinkissue17400 messages
2013-08-24 15:03:15ncoghlancreate