Message195852
is_private was, as you note, basically shorthand for is_RFC1918 (and is_RFC4193 for v6). It's not a particularly well-named method, but at the time that I wrote it (~5 years ago?), it did what I needed it to do.
I'm not sure what you mean by an 'is_natted()' method; there's nothing in particular preventing someone from natting a globally unique address. is_global() makes some sense to me, and it appears that I most likely have to update is_reserved, but I don't understand is_forwardable(). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-08-22 01:15:28 | pmoody | set | recipients:
+ pmoody, terry.reedy, jcea, ncoghlan, vstinner, macfreek, christian.heimes, santoso.wijaya, leim |
2013-08-22 01:15:28 | pmoody | set | messageid: <1377134128.7.0.576309685982.issue17400@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-08-22 01:15:28 | pmoody | link | issue17400 messages |
2013-08-22 01:15:28 | pmoody | create | |
|