This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients ezio.melotti, gvanrossum, mrabarnett, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka
Date 2013-03-23.13:56:05
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1364046965.39.0.964116896559.issue17441@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I think we could happily call such code buggy or at least suboptimal. The docs don't even mention that re.compile() actually uses a cache.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-03-23 13:56:05pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, gvanrossum, ezio.melotti, mrabarnett, serhiy.storchaka
2013-03-23 13:56:05pitrousetmessageid: <1364046965.39.0.964116896559.issue17441@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-03-23 13:56:05pitroulinkissue17441 messages
2013-03-23 13:56:05pitroucreate