Message184456
Sorry for taking long time to respond. full_url has been in the shape it is for many versions, changing it in backwards incompatible way be do more harm than good.
- I would be really interested to know why the present form of full_url presented any limitation for developing an client? Apart from get_full_url there are other ways to get full_url and url associated. Any details on "Why this is must"? The explain snippet below gives the assumption on full_url setting, I could not get need for change from this. Personally, I am 0 to -1 on this too, as in I cannot see a clear need for this change. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-03-18 14:25:55 | orsenthil | set | recipients:
+ orsenthil, terry.reedy, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, demian.brecht |
2013-03-18 14:25:55 | orsenthil | set | messageid: <1363616755.23.0.631482346739.issue17272@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-03-18 14:25:55 | orsenthil | link | issue17272 messages |
2013-03-18 14:25:54 | orsenthil | create | |
|